However, is this really the case? Do players in winning conferences, specifically the big, bad SEC, get drafted higher than players on "weaker" conferences? Does the best recruiting conference perform the best on the field?
According to scout.com, the SEC conference is, in fact, typically the best recruiting school.
As you can see from the chart above, the SEC typically gets more top 100 recruits than the other big six conferences (ACC, Big Ten, PAC 12, Big 12 and Big East). The SEC's only been bested ONCE since 2002.
Does recruiting equate to wins? They're pretty good each year, but it's not as clear cut as you would think. However, the SEC is always one of the more highly ranked conferences when the dust settles at the end of the season, according to the Associated Press rankings.
Does the SEC pay dividends to the recruits who commit to their schools and help collect top 25 rankings when compared to the other conferences? NFL teams do draft more SEC players than the other conferences in the majority of years since 2000, but it's certainly not a safe bet.
So, Recruits fare pretty well on NFL draft day when committing to SEC schools, but it isn't necessarily always THE safest conference to bet on. The SEC does the best job recruiting, but it doesn't ALWAYS equate to being the dominate conference every year.